And still you believe in them? a comment from Che Det's dot com

*** The Fate of an Honest Intellectual

by: Noam Chomsky

Excerpted from Understanding Power, The New Press, 2002, pp. 244-248

http://www.chomsky.info/

I'll tell you another, last case—and there are many others like this. Here's a story which is really tragic. How many of you know about Joan Peters, the book by Joan Peters? There was this best-seller a few years ago [in 1984], it went through about ten printings, by a woman named Joan Peters—or at least, signed by Joan Peters—called From Time Immemorial. It was a big scholarly-looking book with lots of footnotes, which purported to show that the Palestinians were all recent immigrants [i.e. to the Jewish-settled areas of the former Palestine, during the British mandate years of 1920 to 1948]. And it was very popular—it got literally hundreds of rave reviews, and no negative reviews: the Washington Post, the New York Times, everybody was just raving about it. Here was this book which proved that there were really no Palestinians! Of course, the implicit message was, if Israel kicks them all out there's no moral issue, because they're just recent immigrants who came in because the Jews had built up the country. And there was all kinds of demographic analysis in it, and a big professor of demography at the University of Chicago [Philip M. Hauser] authenticated it. That was the big intellectual hit for that year: Saul Bellow, Barbara Tuchman, everybody was talking about it as the greatest thing since chocolate cake.Well, one graduate student at Princeton, a guy named Norman Finkelstein, started reading through the book. He was interested in the history of Zionism, and as he read the book he was kind of surprised by some of the things it said. He's a very careful student, and he started checking the references—and it turned out that the whole thing was a hoax, it was completely faked: probably it had been put together by some intelligence agency or something like that. Well, Finkelstein wrote up a short paper of just preliminary findings, it was about twenty-five pages or so, and he sent it around to I think thirty people who were interested in the topic, scholars in the field and so on, saying: "Here's what I've found in this book, do you think it's worth pursuing?"
Well, he got back one answer, from me. I told him, yeah, I think it's an interesting topic, but I warned him, if you follow this, you're going to get in trouble—because you're going to expose the American intellectual community as a gang of frauds, and they are not going to like it, and they're going to destroy you. So I said: if you want to do it, go ahead, but be aware of what you're getting into. It's an important issue, it makes a big difference whether you eliminate the moral basis for driving out a population—it's preparing the basis for some real horrors—so a lot of people's lives could be at stake. But your life is at stake too, I told him, because if you pursue this, your career is going to be ruined.

Well, he didn't believe me. We became very close friends after this, I didn't know him before. He went ahead and wrote up an article, and he started submitting it to journals. Nothing: they didn't even bother responding. I finally managed to place a piece of it in In These Times, a tiny left-wing journal published in Illinois, where some of you may have seen it. Otherwise nothing, no response. Meanwhile his professors—this is Princeton University, supposed to be a serious place—stopped talking to him: they wouldn't make appointments with him, they wouldn't read his papers, he basically had to quit the program.

By this time, he was getting kind of desperate, and he asked me what to do. I gave him what I thought was good advice, but what turned out to be bad advice: I suggested that he shift over to a different department, where I knew some people and figured he'd at least be treated decently. That turned out to be wrong. He switched over, and when he got to the point of writing his thesis he literally could not get the faculty to read it, he couldn't get them to come to his thesis defense. Finally, out of embarrassment, they granted him a Ph.D.—he's very smart, incidentally—but they will not even write a letter for him saying that he was a student at Princeton University. I mean, sometimes you have students for whom it's hard to write good letters of recommendation, because you really didn't think they were very good—but you can write something, there are ways of doing these things. This guy was good, but he literally cannot get a letter.

He's now living in a little apartment somewhere in New York City, and he's a part-time social worker working with teenage drop-outs. Very promising scholar—if he'd done what he was told, he would have gone on and right now he'd be a professor somewhere at some big university. Instead he's working part-time with disturbed teenaged kids for a couple thousand dollars a year. That's a lot better than a death squad, it's true—it's a whole lot better than a death squad. But those are the techniques of control that are around.

But let me just go on with the Joan Peters story. Finkelstein's very persistent: he took a summer off and sat in the New York Public Library, where he went through every single reference in the book—and he found a record of fraud that you cannot believe. Well, the New York intellectual community is a pretty small place, and pretty soon everybody knew about this, everybody knew the book was a fraud and it was going to be exposed sooner or later. The one journal that was smart enough to react intelligently was the New York Review of Books—they knew that the thing was a sham, but the editor didn't want to offend his friends, so he just didn't run a review at all. That was the one journal that didn't run a review.

Meanwhile, Finkelstein was being called in by big professors in the field who were telling him, "Look, call off your crusade; you drop this and we'll take care of you, we'll make sure you get a job," all this kind of stuff. But he kept doing it—he kept on and on. Every time there was a favorable review, he'd write a letter to the editor which wouldn't get printed; he was doing whatever he could do. We approached the publishers and asked them if they were going to respond to any of this, and they said no—and they were right. Why should they respond? They had the whole system buttoned up, there was never going to be a critical word about this in the United States. But then they made a technical error: they allowed the book to appear in England, where you can't control the intellectual community quite as easily.

Well, as soon as I heard that the book was going to come out in England, I immediately sent copies of Finkelstein's work to a number of British scholars and journalists who are interested in the Middle East—and they were ready. As soon as the book appeared, it was just demolished, it was blown out of the water. Every major journal, the Times Literary Supplement, the London Review, the Observer, everybody had a review saying, this doesn't even reach the level of nonsense, of idiocy. A lot of the criticism used Finkelstein's work without any acknowledgment, I should say—but about the kindest word anybody said about the book was "ludicrous," or "preposterous."

Well, people here read British reviews—if you're in the American intellectual community, you read the Times Literary Supplement and the London Review, so it began to get a little embarrassing. You started getting back-tracking: people started saying, "Well, look, I didn't really say the book was good, I just said it's an interesting topic," things like that. At that point, the New York Review swung into action, and they did what they always do in these circumstances. See, there's like a routine that you go through—if a book gets blown out of the water in England in places people here will see, or if a book gets praised in England, you have to react. And if it's a book on Israel, there's a standard way of doing it: you get an Israeli scholar to review it. That's called covering your ass—because whatever an Israeli scholar says, you're pretty safe: no one can accuse the journal of anti-Semitism, none of the usual stuff works.

So after the Peters book got blown out of the water in England, the New York Review assigned it to a good person actually, in fact Israel's leading specialist on Palestinian nationalism [Yehoshua Porath], someone who knows a lot about the subject. And he wrote a review, which they then didn't publish—it went on for almost a year without the thing being published; nobody knows exactly what was going on, but you can guess that there must have been a lot of pressure not to publish it. Eventually it was even written up in the New York Times that this review wasn't getting published, so finally some version of it did appear. It was critical, it said the book is nonsense and so on, but it cut corners, the guy didn't say what he knew.

Actually, the Israeli reviews in general were extremely critical: the reaction of the Israeli press was that they hoped the book would not be widely read, because ultimately it would be harmful to the Jews—sooner or later it would get exposed, and then it would just look like a fraud and a hoax, and it would reflect badly on Israel. They underestimated the American intellectual community, I should say.

Anyhow, by that point the American intellectual community realized that the Peters book was an embarrassment, and it sort of disappeared—nobody talks about it anymore. I mean, you still find it at newsstands in the airport and so on, but the best and the brightest know that they are not supposed to talk about it anymore: because it was exposed and they were exposed.

Well, the point is, what happened to Finkelstein is the kind of thing that can happen when you're an honest critic—and we could go on and on with other cases like that. [Editors' Note: Finkelstein has since published several books with independent presses.]

Still, in the universities or in any other institution, you can often find some dissidents hanging around in the woodwork—and they can survive in one fashion or another, particularly if they get community support. But if they become too disruptive or too obstreperous—or you know, too effective—they're likely to be kicked out. The standard thing, though, is that they won't make it within the institutions in the first place, particularly if they were that way when they were young—they'll simply be weeded out somewhere along the line. So in most cases, the people who make it through the institutions and are able to remain in them have already internalized the right kinds of beliefs: it's not a problem for them to be obedient, they already are obedient, that's how they got there. And that's pretty much how the ideological control system perpetuates itself in the schools—that's the basic story of how it operates, I think.

So You believe in "THEM", eh?

The following is a complete copy, comments included from
http://bigdogdotcom.wordpress.com/2010/12/27/kua-kia-soong-a-traitor/



Former DAP Petaling Jaya Utara MP Dr Kua Kia Soong recently launched his book “Questioning Arms Spending in Malaysia”. The book launch, was made in London on 14 December in Melur Restaurant, Edgware Road.

Isn’t this an act of treachery?

Dr Kua, who is currently the SUARAM Executive Director and DAP member definitely has other means to question the arms spending of the Federal Government. There is this forum called Dewan Rakyat where no less 78 Pakatan Rakyat MPs (which his party DAP is part of the tri-party-marriage-of-(in)convenience-between-backstabbing-strange-bedfellows) and Dewan Negara where they have 8 Senators.

If questions are being posted in the august house, then the Prime Minister, Minister of Defense and Minister of Finance are compelled to answer. Of course there would be a debate. Dr Kua could get his DAP colleagues to attack what or which ever spending with facts and demand answers.

Writing a book and launching it abroad serves a different connotation entirely. It is a one sided attack. It is suspiciously with an intent of malice, especially taking the details or presumed details of Malaysian militarium in the open and on an international platform. This is an act of anarchy. No difference from when PKR Lembah Pantai Nurul Izzah lied in Jakarta about the Scorpene Perdana Class subs inability to be operational.

Dr Kua is the sort of scholar who choses to be deliberate inaccuracies, unsubstantiated facts, lop sided foreign mission/agency reports and is very unfair and bordering an ill intent with his presentation and analysis. Last June blogger Jebat Must Die did an in depth analysis and counter Dr Kua’s lame and politically-skewed book with facts on 13 May 1969. A leading Military Analyst Dzirhan Mahadzir took the first salvo against Dr Kua on this.

Excerpts from Dzrihan’s analysis on Dr Kua’s new attempt to skew facts:

Now I have no problem with defence spending being scrutinized or criticised, but my problem is when the matter becomes politicised, distorted and used by people to fulfill their own agendas or when people doing such don’t know what they are talking about or when they deliberately used racial issues which is the entire problem with Dr. Kua’s book.

The first flaw in the book is the manner of citations used, there’s an inconsistancy in Dr. Kua’s approach, he gives name credits to articles by writers like my old boss Bob Karniol, who recruited me into Janes and a few others but the numerous times he cites articles in Janes and Defence Review Asia (mostly mine) and the mainstream media articles in NST, Star and others, he can’t see fit to name the authors and title of the articles. Now the reason for this is important as knowing who wrote the article, so we can judge the accuracy and quality as not all writers are the same, and the context of the quotation based on the article title. The other problem is just on a personal basis as Dr Kua quotes my JDW focus on the Malaysian Armed Forces several times but it doesn’t rate a mention in the selected articles list in the bibliography, wherelse articles he quotes once or twice does which again falls foul of normal conventions in such, like I said I get no credit .

The other flaw in the book is that in all honest sense, the supposedly well researched book has no original information, as pointed by both Marhalim and Azra, all the book does is quote materials published publicly, even then Dr. Kua doesn’t bother finding out additional information or digging out new information. The so called expose is a lie as nothing contained in the book hasn’t been talked about. Furthermore if it really is to be an expose, why did Dr. Kua not find people willing to talk, even anonymously about the alledged wrongdoings etc. If the publishers and writer had been honest enough to state that the book simply was based on open sources and a compilation, I’d have been less critical but as it is…..

*************

(Note: Dzirhan teaches at the Armed Forces College and writes for Jane’s Defense Weekly)

The authorities should really look into this attempt of Dr Kua to undermine the strategic and operational interest of the Malaysian Armed Forces. This sort of person is definitely belong to be labeled as ‘Disobedient and Ungrateful Malaysian’.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)

•{Videos} Teo Soh Lung at the launch of “Beyond the Blue Gate: Recollectio…
Ads by Google

5 Unbeatable Stock Picks
Discover How To Make Profits That Could Last A Lifetime!
www.taipanpublishinggroup.com




Published in: Disobedient and ungrateful Malaysianson December 27, 2010 at 11:03 Comments (11)


LikeBe the first to like this post.The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://bigdogdotcom.wordpress.com/2010/12/27/kua-kia-soong-a-traitor/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

11 Comments Leave a comment
On December 27, 2010 at 13:47 Wake UP! said:
This treacherous act confirms that they have inside information about the Malaysian militarium.

Where did this author got it from? He should be picked up and questioned by the police or the military.

Reply
On December 27, 2010 at 16:12 Tweets that mention Penipuan DAP berterusan; slps mengemukakan fakta salah 13Mei, Kua menipu lg. Baca big dog - -- Topsy.com said:
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Didi Mazril. Didi Mazril said: RT @tunfaisal: Penipuan DAP berterusan; slps mengemukakan fakta salah 13Mei, Kua menipu lg. Baca big dog – http://bit.ly/eVSYgy [...]

Reply
On December 27, 2010 at 16:24 Average Joe said:
Menteri Amaran tunggu apa lagi?!

Reply
On December 27, 2010 at 16:27 Jitu said:
“Dr Kua is the sort of scholar who choses to be deliberate inaccuracies, unsubstantiated facts, lop sided foreign mission/agency reports ..”

Can some one tell me what scholar is he actually? Is he a medical doctor or a PhD? If PhD, what field?

He can’t be worth his salt if he deliberately writes inaccuracies, slants the facts, does not substantiate his claims. No medical doctor would do that. No genuine PhD holder does that. Usually they are trained or well versed in “hypothesis, theories and facts” before they are awarded with PhDs.

Has anybody checked whether he genuinely has a PhD? Don’t trust DAP fellows. Remember “Sir Wong”, a DAP information chief or something in Sabah who even doctored photographs purportedly showing he was receiving a knighthood from the Queen of England? terrible fellows these DAP characters. Ultra kiasu, even pure, outright cheats and liars, plain and simple.

This Kua fellow certainly wants the sensation aspect of the matter, to sell his books, like the tabloids of England which sell gossips, rumours and half truths to increase their circulation. Anybody verified the claim that his May 13 book was a “best seller”? What standard used to determine that? What number of copies exactly sold?

All told, this is one hell of a doctor – if he is really a doctor, whatever the discipline may be. Agree with BD that he could have got political mileage if he had launched his book in Malaysia or raised the issue in Parliament. But a bloody gullible fellow. More money launching the book in London, higher purchasing power there, the populace is more aroused by sensationalised info. To hell with propriety, etiquette and a sense of obligation to Malaysia, he’d say. To hell with him we should say.

Reply
On December 27, 2010 at 19:13 KaboingToing said:
Agree that we should know the authencity of his Doctorate. Also need to understand how can an institution keep giving recognition to someone whom academia knows to lie and make bad reference.

Reply
On December 27, 2010 at 20:53 Zen said:
He was arrested twice — under the Internal Security Act (ISA) during Operation Lalang in 1987, and the second time for participating in the Second Asia-Pacific Conference on East Timor in 1996. That tells the kind of fellow he is.

He was only a one-term DAP MP in the 1990s. That tells how popular (or unpopular) he was.

Reply
On December 27, 2010 at 17:10 VARUNA said:
ANOTHER MODERN DAY ‘MIN YUEN’…….

Reply
On December 27, 2010 at 18:08 Quad Erat Demonstratum said:
Biggie,

Obviously Kua Kia Soong is up to something evil again. Despite JMD nailed this DAP-commie after his “13 May” book, he dares to go one step higher: from being anti-Malay to anti-Malaysia.

From the excerpts, it shows that Kua’s book is to tell the world that Malaysian Government are idiots in procuring these weapons.

Varuna is bloody right! Kua Kia Soong is a MODERN DAY MIN YUEN!

I hope someone do a police report against this bastard & the authorities act accordingly! Means that if his writings is seditious and/or undermine national security, nail this bastard!

Please la. Don’t short-change us for pacifying-the-Chinese-politics!

Reply
On December 27, 2010 at 22:15 marzuki ahmad said:
apa nak tunggu lagi Menteri KDN dah terhantuk baru tengadah ke….lemah betul kerajaan kita sekarang ni patut kita ganti yang berani !!!

Geram

Reply
On December 28, 2010 at 05:08 Jimmie said:
Such an asshole like to should be dumped into the sea. He shall no longer be a Malaysian. BIG TRAITOR

Reply
On December 28, 2010 at 23:07 VARUNA said:
Ni yang sedih ni. Baru kita meratapi pemergian Allahyarham Jeneral Tun Ibrahim Ismail – tak kering lagi pusara Allahyarham.

Kita mungkin tak ada bangkangan kalau benda ni diketengahkan dalam bentuk akademik dan berlandaskan fakta. Ini tidak, terang-terang buku ini ditulis berasaskan fitnah, spekulasi, maklumat yang direka-reka, selective and mostly out of context kemudiannya diputar-belitkan dan nampaknya bermotif jahat.

Jelas sekali golongan Min Yuen moden ni dah makin berani dan biadap. Mereka bermain api dengan mengipas sentimen serta amarah rakyat jelata untuk bersikap anti establishment.

Kua ni juga tanpa segan silu membela Chin Peng sebagai pejuang negara tapi conveniently tergamak melupakan ratusan malah mungkin ribuan mangsa yang jadi korban pengkhianat komunis itu. Berikut apa yg pernah dia tulis tentang Chin Peng:

In recent years, there has been plenty of breast beating among the Umnoputras, with flag waving, keris kissing and singing of patriotic songs. But how many of these Umnoputras can proudly stand up and say
that they patriotically took part in the liberation war against the British colonialists and the Japanese fascists?

Hardly any!

Yet, how many Malayan patriots have given their lives in these two campaigns? Have they ever been honoured by the country they defended? They were honoured by the Allies for their valour during the anti-Japanese resistance after the Second World War in London. Have
our historians exposed those who collaborated with the Japanese fascists during the Second World War – the “quislings who sold out the patriot game?”

At least one man, Chin Peng can claim that he achieved this and today he merely wants the opportunity to visit his homeland that he defended
against British colonialism and Japanese fascism but he is unable to do this!

Ini pula pandangannya tentang lafaz taat setia kepada SPB Yang Dipertuan Agong dan menyanyi lagu NEGARAKU di Kemunting;

At Kamunting, the so-called “rehabilitation” programme included a weekly “assembly” during which we were supposed to sing the national anthem as if we were back at school and to make a pledge (Ikrar) of
allegiance to the king, country and the Rukunegara.

Many of us “hardcore” did not participate in this vacuous token of “patriotism”. It brought home the scathing quote by Samuel Johnson that,
“Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.”

Sampai bila agaknya kita nak biarkan orang sebegini?

Sunday, December 26, 2010 ciplak direct siap dgn komen dari rbf online

Nik Aziz telah tahu apa nasib yang bakal menimpa Pas dalam prk Dun Tenang, semalam sekali lagi dia mempersoalkan sistem pilihan raya yang dijalankan di negara ini dan berkata seperti di bawah.

"Saya tidak percaya kepada pilihan raya, nama saja pilihan raya tetapi penuh dengan penipuan. "Kita boleh lihat apa yang berlaku di Galas, duit berguni-guni dibawa untuk membeli undi bagi memastikan calon Barisan Nasional (BN) menang,"
Sumber : Utusan Online

Dia sudah tahu apa nasibnya dalam prk itu, itu pasallah cepat-cepat dia buat persepsi begitu dan mengharapkan persepsi itu berlanjutan sehingga keputusan pilihanraya diumumkan. Sesudah keputusan diumumkan dia atau beruk-beruk peliharaannya akan buat kenyataan lagi "kito tahu doh kita akan kalah, kerana spr menipu". Maka terselamatlah dia dan Pas dari menjadi sebab kekalahan dan kesalahan diletakkan ke atas bahu spr. Rakyat buta hati pula akan percaya bulat-bulat kepada cakap Nik Aziz.

Lihat fakta di bawah ini kemudian sila fikirkan benar atau tidak sistem pilihanraya kita penuh dengan penipuan.

Dalam pru 2008 buat pertama kalinya dalam sejarah BN hilang majoriti 2/3 dalam Dewan Rakyat.

Kenapa BN hilang 2/3 ?

Kerana Pembangkang menang dan rampas banyak kerusi BN.

Kenapa pembangkang menang ?

Kerana rakyat yang pilih mereka dalam p/raya.

Kalau sistem p/raya kita penuh dengan penipuan macamana mereka boleh menang banyak kerusi sehingga BN hilang 2/3 ?

Itu satu bab, sekarang kita masuk bab ke dua pula.

Selain kehilangan 2/3 di Dewan Rakyat, BN juga mencipta satu lagi sejarah, iaitu tewas di empat negeri yang diperintah mereka. Kedah, P.Pinang, Perak dan Selangor.

Kalau sistem pilihanraya kita penuh dengan penipuan bagaimana mereka boleh bentuk kerajaan di empat negeri berkenaan ?

Itu bab kedua, sekarang mari kita masuk bab ke tiga pula.

Daripada 26.8.08 hingga 4.11.10 SPR telah mengendalikan 13 pilihanraya kecil.

1) P.Pauh - 26.8.08-PKR menang.

2) K.Trengganu - 17.1.09-PAS menang

3) B.Gantang - 7.4.09-PAS menang

4) B.Selambau - 7.4.09-PKR menang

5) Batang Ai - 7.4.09-BN menang

6) Penanti - 31.5.09-PKR menang

7) M.Urai - 14.7.09-PAS menang

8) Pmtg Pasir - 25.8.09-PAS menang

9) Bgn Pinang - 11.10.09-BN menang

10) Hulu Selangor - 25.4.10-BN menang

11) Sibu - 16.5.10-DAP menang

12) Galas - 4.11.10-BN menang

13) Batu Sapi - 4.11.10 - BN menang

Daripada 13 prk, Pas dan rakan-rakan seliwatnya telah menang sebanyak 8 kerusi, manakala BN hanya memenangi 5 kerusi.

Kalau sistem p/raya kita penuh dengan penipuan jangan haraplah kau orang nak menang 8 kali, semua BN sapu bersihlah beb.

Itu bab ketiga, sekarang kita masuk bab keempat dan yang terakhir.

Mung dengar molek aku ghoyat ko mu ni wahai pok nik ngok ngek.

Kalau sistem pilihanraya kita penuh dengan penipuan jangan haraplah Pas dapat menang dalam pilihanraya di Kelantan selama 5 kali p/raya berturut-turut (1990, 1995, 1999, 2004 dan 2008).

Tak rasalah mung nak duduk kerusi MB sampai hari ini kalau SPR menipu. Menantu dan anak betino mu pun tak rasa mewahlah hidup mereka hari ini.

Kawan-kawan sekalian itulah sikap Pas. Mereka kata mereka memperjuangkan islam, tapi perangai mengalahkan iblis. Mereka tidak dapat menerima ketetapan Qada dan Qadar.

Kalah sahaja pilihanraya , ada sahaja onar yang mereka buat. Waktu mereka menang bukan main ek lagi. Macam-macam kenyataan sombong yang mereka keluarkan.

Rakan-rakan sekalian, saya kalau bercakap saya tidak akan bercakap kosong, saya selalu kemukakan bukti bersama bagi menangkis dakwaan-dakwaan jahat mereka.

Dibawah ini adalah bukti-buktinya.

Kenyataan Nik Aziz sewaktu hendak menghadapi prk Permatang Pasir

Entah apalah rahsia yang tersimpan dalam lipatan perbendaharaan ilmu Allah yang Maha Luas itu sehingga berlaku 8 pilihan raya kecil sejak Pilihan Raya Umum Ke-12, tiada siapa jua yang mampu menekanya. Apa yang hanya boleh kita baca dari 7 pilihan raya kecil yang telah berlalu, parti yang bertanding dari Pakatan Rakyat (PR) telah menang sebanyak 6 kali berturut-turut. BN cuma menang 1 kali; itupun di Batang Ai,Serawak. Ini realiti dan ini kenyataan.
Sumber: Blog Nik Aziz

Selepas kemenangan Pas dan PKR dalam prk Bukit Gantang dan Bukit Selambau

Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat menyifatkan kemenangan Pas dan Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) dalam dua pilihan raya kecil semalam meletakkan pakatan pembangkang cuma 'selangkah' lagi untuk menerajui negara.
Sumber: Utusan Online

Selepas kemenangan DAP dalam prk Sibu

Tuan Guru Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat menyifatkan calon Pakatan Rakyat yang menang dalam pilihan raya kecil Parlimen Sibu semalam sebagai isyarat jelas rakyat telah menolak Umno dan Barisan Nasional (BN).
Sumber : Harakah...kah...kah...kah daily

Kenyataan Nik Aziz selepas Pas kalah di Galas

"Saya rasa ragu, kerananya keesokan hari nak mengundi tu, malam tu saya tengok di televisyen seorang menteri cakap dah BN akan menang banyak. Dia tahu mari mana BN akan menang banyak, sedangkan esok baru nak mengundi. Makna ada benda dia buat. Bagaimana dia boleh berkata demikian, jika perancangan tidak dibuat. Itu yang meragukan"
Sumber : Gelombang Merah

Anda telah baca apa yang kemukakan, sekarang masa untuk berfikir dan nilai yang mana lebih teruk antara perangai Pas dengan perangai iblis ?

Posted by ruang bicara faisal at 11:54 AM 4 comments:
Anonymous said...
Rakyat malaysia yg berakal dpt menilai kata2 merapu nik aziz ni melainkan pemuja2 dia yg sanggup minum air rebusan selipar wali...
Ni la manusia yg benar2 wat kerosakan pada umat islam..

December 26, 2010 2:01 PM
Anonymous said...
hidup kalo dah dok main taik ... taik laa jadi nya .... ???

December 26, 2010 2:31 PM
Anonymous said...
nak cerita pasai nik ajis ni sampai kiamat pun tak habih..

December 26, 2010 2:45 PM
CucuAtok said...
Salam.... biasalah tu kalu dah menang semuanya bersih dan menjalankan tugas tapi kalu kalah berbagai 'fatwa' yang di keluarkan untuk menutup malu.

Tambah lagi pula kat johor yang terkenal dengan kubu kuat BN tetapi awas! silap langkah tegai maruah.

December

Interesting bylines

PERLEMBAGAAN UMNO

FASAL 1 – Nama

Pertubuhan ini dikenali dengan nama Pertubuhan Kebangsaan Melayu Bersatu atau UMNO (United Malays National Organisation)

FASAL 2 – Cogankata UMNO

BERSATU – BERSETIA – BERKHIDMAT

FASAL 3 – Asas & Tujuan

UMNO adalah sebuah parti politik yang berjuang mendukung cita-cita kebangsaan Melayu demi mengekalkan maruah dan martabat bangsa, agama dan negara.

3.1 Mempertahankan kemerdekaan dan kedaulatan negara.
3.2 Mendukung dan mempertahankan Perlembagaan Negara, Perlembagaan Negeri-negeri dan Raja Berpelembagaan.
3.3 Menegak, mempertahan dan mengembangkan Islam, agama rasmi negara serta menghormati prinsip kebangsaan beragama.
3.4 Mempertahankan kedaulatan rakyat dan keadilan sosial dengan mengamalkan Sistem Pemerintahan Demokrasi Berparlimen serta memajukan ekonomi rakyat Melayu dan Bumiputera khasnya dan rakyat Malaysia amnya.
3.5 Menjamin kedudukan Bahasa Kebangsaan (Bahasa Melayu) sebagai bahasa rasmi yang tunggal dan Kebudayaan Kebangsaan yang berteraskan Kebudayaan Melayu.
3.6 Mewujudkan kerjasama antara kaum bagi melahirkan satu bangsa Malaysia yang kuat dan bersatu berasaskan kepada hak-hak Asasi Manusia dan Hak-Hak Istimewa Orang Melayu dan Bumiputera.

FASAL 4 – Jenis Ahli

4.1 Ahli-ahli UMNO adalah dua jenis:
4.1.1 Ahli Biasa
4.1.2 Ahli Bergabung
4.2 Ahli Biasa ialah Warganegara Malaysia yang berbangsa Melayu atau Bumiputera yang berusia 18 tahun keatas.
4.3 Ahli Bergabung ialah sebuah pertubuhan politik yang bersetuju berkerjasama dengan UMNO dan menerima syarat-syarat yang ditetapkan oleh Majlis Tertinggi
Ini lah asasnya perjuangan Melayu/Islam UMNO

Gopal Raj Kumar

LAWYERS ON TRIAL – A MURDER MOST FOUL
Posted on September 17, 2010
by grkumar| 5 Comments
ARE THESE AN EXCEPTION TO OR ARE THEY THEY RULE

The legal profession in Malaysia has been unaccountable and unresponsive to the public for too long. The government now has an obligation to intervene and to dissolve the Malaysian Bar and its affiliated bodies and to bring them all under the control of a statutory body or the Attorney General or minister for law and order.

These suspects in the murder of Sosilawati (and I stress suspects) lawyers, are no different to the vast majority of lawyers practising in Malaysia. They have little or no effective supervision over their conduct as lawyers or over the quality of the services in law they provide to their long suffering overcharged clients.

Some like the accused in the Sosilawati murders have in the past and continue in the present to indulge in extra legal activities as an adjunct to their regular legal professional activities, using strong arm tactics to get the results they want from their clients and their opponents. Often employing illicit means to obtain an advantage over their opponents. There is nothing new in the conduct of much of the legal profession in this regard.

Others still (at a perceived higher level of the profession) use the muscle of political influence, engage corrupt police as enforcers, whilst many more engage in the practice of extortion in its pure definition. These allegations appear from individual complaints to be the rule rather than the exception in the legal profession in Malaysia, although these allegations if put to the bar council are likely to be vehemently denied by their board.

The most despicable of offences lawyers are accused of arise from their failure to perform adequately and honourably their obligations towards clients in “capital” cases facing death. Especially where “capital” cases are concerned their conduct is found to be seriously wanting.

The level of extortion and emotional blackmailing of families of death row inmates is legend in the Malaysian legal profession. No conclusive or indepth study into misconduct in the legal profession in Malaysia of any substance has to date been undertaken by anyone. An opportunity or the purpose has now arisen and government must rise to the occassion.

There is a plethora of evidence both anecdotal and substantive which demands the government must act with a Royal Commission of inquiry and to now turn the blow torch on the bellies of these yellow livered bunch of bullies, a law unto themselves thus far in the wake of the Sosilawati murder.

These allegations of improper conduct applies also to those so called “top” criminal lawyers in the country including in particular those who sit in parliament and on large corporations and on public committees for a side income and influence, hiding behind legal and parliamentary privilege to carry out their deeds. Their privileged positions have become their fig leaf to conceal their otherwise nefarious, unmeritorious and disgraceful conduct, eagerly blaming their failures on government in the process.

http://takemon.wordpress.com/2009/08/22/they-shoot-horses-dont-they/

The collective failure of the legal profession to perform to a standard expected of them is whats at issue here. And without a governing body capable of enforcing those standards, this is the result. An extreme example though this may be, it nonetheless is a wake up call to all. Bring the bar to heel and get rid of that politically driven coeterie of loud mouths who use their privilege and profession to attack government, dividing the community in the process and defaming anyone who does not see the world through their eyes, whilst ignoring their primary role in service to the public.

AN OPEN AND INDEPENDENT INQUIRY INTO THE LEGAL PROFESSION NOW

An open inquiry and a public audit of legal practitioners and their firms will no doubt be resisted at every level to protect what has become a golden goose to many in the profession. An indepedent outside body should be appointed to audit the practicing standards of individual lawyers urgently as a priority.

The Bar Council should have no input into the process. The vast majority of them live in an intellectual and regulatory vacuum believing themselves to be competent and efficient, the source of their self righteousness. What is likely to come out of such an inquiry will undoubtedly shock the nation. It is a long overdue exercise into a self regulated incompetent unaccountable powerful sector of the community working against the public interests.

The governing peak professional body of the legal profession in Malaysia, The Malaysian Bar is a self serving inept body incapable of any supervisory role over their members. They perform a cursory duty to themselves behind closed doors. The body itself at its board level is made up of equally inefficient and incompetent people. Mostly loud mouths who seek power at any cost even if that comes at the expense of the paying suffering public.

The legal profession should be opened up to independent public scrutiny now. The quality of legal services are overly expensive and very low by universal standards. There ought to be an inquiry into the profession and the Malaysian Bar Council itself. Government has been delivered an opportunity on a silver platter to once and for all shake up these self appointed self serving spokespeople for the rights of everyone, who in reality have been serving themselves all the way to the bank, unaccountable to the public they are meant to serve in the process.

A final note:

Datukships like that purportedly given to the accused in the Sosilawati murder, have been on sale for a while. Let’s make no pretences about the point. It demeans the role of our traditional rulers and brings the title into disrepute.

CONCLUSION

Each of the accused if found guilty by a competent court should be hanged till dead. It is hoped the legal profession has something to say for their members facing charges of a capital offence. Human life has become a dispensable commodity in Malaysia in its quest for personal wealth and materialism.

Likewise it is hoped that the Malaysian bar will have th courage of their ‘convictions’ to come forward and assure the public that the allegations against tow and possibly more of their membership are isolated cases of individuals within the profession going astray, rather than this being an extreme of the example of what really goes on within the legal profession in Malaysia.

The silence of the Bar Council and the Malaysian Bar in the face of such an event as the Sosilawati murder allegations levelled against one of their own, may well and justly be interpreted as a form of acknowledgement by the Malaysian Bar, that thee are paralysed by the truth emerging about what many have over the years suspected of their collective membership as a dishonourable and lawless body of self serving individuals in whom the trust of a nation has been betrayed.

Gopal Raj Kumar

Pure Shiite: A Reply to Tun Perkasa Post : Peruntukan Perlembagaan dan Isu Bahasa Pengantar Di Sekolah Jenis

Pure Shiite: A Reply to Tun Perkasa Post : Peruntukan Perlembagaan dan Isu Bahasa Pengantar Di Sekolah Jenis

you must hate america if you don't read this

I was browsing my old mail bag on jitraguy@yahoo.co.uk and found this..
SO I just thought I'd share it with my visitors.. Thank You

The US Government vs. America
by Anthony Gregory

As far as the nationalists are concerned, to oppose the U.S. warfare
state is to despise America, to condemn the atrocities committed by
the Bush administration is the hate America, to reveal skepticism of
foreign intervention is to reveal disloyalty to America, whereas to be
a shill for all the slaughter done by the U.S. government is to be a
good American.

The Pentagon is America. The Homeland Security Department is America.
The Iraq War is America. George W. Bush is America. The imperial
capital – complete with snipers on the rooftops, armed battalions
keeping the city in siege, and a power elite bent on running the world
– is America, and if you don't like it, you must hate America.

Oddly enough, this principle, usually coming from conservatives or
"libertarian" nationalist internationalists, does not seem to apply to
other things the government does. If you don't like welfare, do you
hate America? If you distrust Social Security, does it mean you hope
for America's downfall? If you are less than enthusiastic about gun
control, public education, or the war on drugs, are you rooting for
the failure of America itself? No.

How about in other countries, at other times? Did the Russians who
spoke out against Stalin hate Russia? Did the Germans who reviled
Hitler hate Germany? Did the Chinese who despised Mao hate China?

These analogies might seem over the top. Even today, America is
certainly among the best places to live inside, despite its many
troubles. For one thing, we still have many freedoms, at least
tacitly, that most other countries do not. For another, living in
America, we have much less a chance of being bombed by the U.S.
government than do foreigners.

This does not mean that Americans are free from the U.S. state.
Americans must still pay rent to the government for the privilege of
earning a living. Americans must still use the inflated, counterfeited
currency controlled by the Federal Reserve monopoly. Americans must
still accept the terms of the "social contract" that dictates where
they send their children to school, what they may put into their own
bodies, which weapons they are free to own, what business arrangements
they may enter, and which government programs, including wars, they
must fund through taxation, upon penalty of imprisonment.

Occasionally, the government here kills the wrong Americans for the
wrong reasons. Police sometimes shoot the wrong person. Sometimes,
there are military-style assaults, conducted by the U.S. government,
against American citizens. If you lived in a certain neighborhood in
Philadelphia in 1985, a certain shack in Idaho in 1992, or a certain
commune in Texas in 1993, you might have found yourself firebombed by
the police department, shot and killed by an FBI sniper, or gassed,
machine-gunned, burned, and crushed to death by the feds.

More often than its military sieges on "its" own citizens, the U.S.
government locks up innocent people who never broke the law for which
they were charged. Even more frequently, the government imprisons
harmless people who broke laws that should not be laws, often ones
that contradict the ostensible Supreme Law that is the Constitution.

For the average American, these nightmares are fortunately not a
reality. But for years nevertheless they have been oppressed by a
ridiculous tax system and regulatory regime, and constantly in danger
of having their property seized, their liberty confined to a jail
cell, or their lives snuffed out, due to the error, incompetence, or
malice of some high-paid bureaucrat in an office building somewhere
they never met.

It has only gotten worse under Bush. Americans can now be spied on by
the federal thought police who are supposedly working to stop
terrorism, detained indefinitely without trial or benefit of habeas
corpus, and, perhaps quite soon, forced to surrender their children to
a national universal mandatory mental-health screening apparatus right
out of Brave New World.

Do you love this? If to oppose the warfare state is to oppose America,
must those who love America also love the state's destruction of the
Bill of Rights, its occasional murders of innocent Americans, its
burgeoning prison-industrial complex filled with peaceful innocents,
its crippling taxation, repressive regulation, medieval property
seizures, and attempts to nationalize the very minds of America's
children?

Do you love seeing America being preyed on by the overblown parasitic
state in Washington, DC? If you truly love America, you should oppose
the government that has always been its greatest enemy – especially as
it concerns the power of that government to kill, not accidentally or
anomalously, as it sometimes does at home, but as a matter of outright
policy, as it does abroad. Or, at a minimum, if you love America, you
should stop cheering on this killing and refuse to participate in the
glorification of the security state that robs Americans blind and uses
the loot to wreck our privacy and liberty and to bomb, crush and
murder foreign innocents.

The U.S. government is now posturing itself to invade the world,
country by country, beginning, it seems, with Iran and Syria. If the
project commences, it will kill thousands on top of the thousands it
has killed in the last three years and the millions it has killed
since it embarked on empire in 1898. I oppose this strongly, not
because I hate America, but because I love America, I love my fellow
Americans, and I do not trust the U.S. state to bring liberty to the
world any more than I trust it to refrain from destroying liberty, as
it has done continually and for the most part increasingly, ever since
the founding of this beautiful country in which I was born and which I
will always love.

February 8, 2005

Anthony Gregory [send him mail] is a writer and musician who lives in
Berkeley, California. He is a research assistant at the Independent
Institute. See his webpage for more articles and personal information.

Copyright © 2005 LewRockwell.com

Wakakaaka molo punya mamat betoi laa, to think that I've been to his house in AMPANG?

alahai, itu pak lah, laa, bukan nya sultan atau agong ? dua kali lima


Rocky's Ferrari kena sapu episode: The Digital Condom Guide for Bloggers
I find it utterly ridiculous when I hear about how our authorities operates.

Nampak sangat bodoh technology.....lead by a relic who don't have a clue on what exactly is going on in the first place....

Bodoh punye mamat nogori.....dulu kecoh sekampung dia the first one to get a Phd from his area.....

Put that shitty piece of paper to work la bingai.......

This is the cyberspace where one can commit an offence and leave no digital trails at all......

Now just ask yourself what can the Modem and the Notebook tell with regards to this episode?

I will not venture into that but instead.... I will provide a Technical Guide for all Bloggers who wants to give these motherfuckers a run around.......this one will work even if you are not anonymous like me...



Step 1
Migrate to Google Chrome, it has a neat function of Incognito Browsing, which does not leave any digital trace of the sites that you have visited

Step 2
Surf using IP Tunnels that will kencing most firewall and will not show the real sites that you have visited, one such sites is Ctunnel you may enable the SSL encryption mode if you want to make it more secure. The best part is that the website you are visiting does not know who you are. It can evade any IP or url ban that your network administrator or ISP might have placed on any of the websites.

Step 3
Remember to always BACK UP your blog (email it to your special secret email address for future recovery) and datas to an external file stored somewhere safe, key files can be uploaded using a Remote File Hosting such as Dropbox, which can automatically sync with Multiple devices including your Blackberries.

Install File Shredders on your PC/Laptops etc. This will allow you to completely wipe out any incriminating information on your PC, some more fancy application can KILL your Iphone, Berries with a simple SMS sent to it....just in case some Jolobu loser wanna come after you....douwsss




Start with that first folks...........let us see if they have the Technological upper-hand against these basic tools.......

spread the word folks.....be safe and secure always.....consider this a digital condom....for your cyber screwing session with the authorities....

Now imagine if Rocky had done all those things.......what can the Notebook and Modem provide? besides the things that are already terang-terang kat depan bijik mata lu on his blog........

To me I believe that what the fuckers have done is a DIRECT VIOLATION of PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS......PUKEEEMAK Lu....

If I was Rocky I would demand to be ON SITE AT ALL TIMES while the NOTEBOOK is in their possession......


What if they plant some evidence?


What if they suddenly wanna DESTROY HIS CHARACTER by ACCUSING him of PAEDO PORN SURFING dan lain lain lagi lah?


What if they CRASH his Laptop and take all his data just to balas dendam?

Dan macam macam what if lagi la kut.......

I won't be 'walking' with all the poyoness out there with you Bro Rocky but rest assured this monkey is there in spirit.......

Peace.....

Ferrarri

Maybe I should write or just copuy paste some things about some melatah minister.. then maybe MACC might want to confiscate my ferrari, but too bad. I only have a thumbdrive,.. I do my blogging and surfing from a public cyber cafe.. shall I name the chain? nahh,

Kugan, Insurance and Barry Wain

KUGAN WHAT REALLY HAPPENED
Posted on February 1, 2010
by grkumar| 18 Comments
WHAT REALLY HAPPENED TO KUGAN

Having conveniently been removed as a priority in their agendas for justice, the fate of Kugan, a man brutally murdered in police custody, appears now to be another statistic not simply to government but to that very vocal opposition that conveniently seeks to muster Indian votes at election time.

At the very heart of this group of policy neutral opportunists is one Lim Kit Siang and his larger than life shadow, Anwar Ibrahim. To Kit Siang through his blog (like the Nutgraph) who excise all those who do not agree blindly with their anti Mahathir, anti UMNO (read anti Malay) rhetoric and propaganda, it seems the plight of people like Kugan do not rate highly enough.

Kugan and all like him in their view have no real right. These are but useful props to them in their wider opposition game plan for government.

THE ETYMOLOGY OF INSURANCE SCAMS IN MALAYSIA

In the very early 1990’s when Anwar Ibrahim was minister for finance, there was a period when Malaysia’s non banking financial sector, particularly its insurance companies came crashing to a halt. It was the result of years of neglect, fraud and absence of prudential regulatory supervision in that sector.

Amongst these giants of insurance was the behemoth Mercantile Insurance SDN Bhd South East Asia Insurance and MAIKA’s own insurance arm which crashed with billions of ringgit in debts and unfunded liabilities. At the top of these insurers and in an irredemable position was Mercantile SDN Bhd.

Theirs was a scam run then by a group of well organized Chinese businessmen in places like the Kelang Valley, Johore Bahru, Penang and surrounding areas. There they indulged in writing temporary cover notes to the mainly Chinese taxi and truck transport industry as well as other areas of general cover. It was a scam of biblical proportions that lay at the root of their operations.

A cash cow for its operators, not its shareholders who only held speculative paper. The classic smoke for the mirrors placed in their annual reports to inflate their share price and to create the general stampede for shares worth little or nothing at all.

The company booked these unrealized earnings (Earned But Not Received EBNR) in its balance sheet and inflated its annual accounts with the assistance of its auditors and accountants some of the biggest names in the business. Arthur Anderson the accounting giant did at the time for these companies what it also did for Enron Inc in the USA which finally brought both it and Enron undone in the 1990′s.

In doing so it allowed the mountain of unrecoverable unrealizable unfunded liabilities and debt to mushroom as the asset base of its balance sheet. These “audited” reports then served to con the company’s shareholders and the market in the process.

Directors and major shareholders of the company drew huge salaries, fees and perks whilst also in the process quietly disposing of their inflated shares in the company to an unsuspecting secondary market where small investor buyers queued up for worthless shares. Ignorant of their true worth, they bought these worthless shares the directors of Mercantile and others like them sold for very large gains to the selling directors.

At the helm of this scam were some of Malaysia’s and the MCA’s most respectable and high profile businessmen. At least two of these were politicians. None of our investigations show a link to Dr. Mahathir or any of his so called cronies (meaning his family and his relatives). Unless of course one identifies MIC and the MCA and its officers and associates as being Mahathir cronies.

If we did name some of the MP’s and their families engaged in this affair who benefitted out of this fraud which is what it was, the immediate charge would be “but yes they are Barisan people”. Or worse still the charge would be that we are anti Chinese.

The scam itself was not novel. The government should have acted earlier but it did not. Anwar must be asked why. In the end the government of Mahathir had to act and it did. Admittedly his government’s reaction was unconventional and knee jerk. But in fairness Anwar was at the helm at the ministry of finance at the time and ultimate responsibility lay with him as minister.

The insurance and banking sectors were suffering from an image problem and confidence crisis. The government had no choice but to take into consideration public and foreign investor perceptions of the non banking finance sectors condition in Malaysia and pumped into the sector billions of dollars of tax payers money to fuel recovery and to bring liquidity back into the sector.

A Singapore think tank recently commissioned one of its own, the former Asian Wall Street Journal writer Barry Wain, to write a fanciful book about Dr. Mahathir and his faults in office which conveniently overlooked this disaster and others presided over by Singapore’s’ celebrated bum boy in the region, Anwar Ibrahim.

To add insult to injury Lim Kit Siang called for a Royal commission into Wain’s scurrilous claims against Mahathir, whilst conveniently remaining ignorant and silent about his political allies and constituents possible complicity in a murderous and wider scam in insurance.

INSURANCE SCAMS AND AUTO THEFT

Insurance theft and fraud on a scale as large as the frauds and thefts Kugan was suspected of being involved in do not run on the whims or actions of a single person. That is plainly impossible. It is organized and requires a great deal of skill and cooperation from both the underwrold and the boards of respectable companies.

Mobsters and organizzed crime czars like Carlo Gambino, Joe Colombo, the Gallo Brothers and Jimmy Gravano, Lansky all knew the immense financial value in these scams if run well. They had all in their time made millions out of such scams in their own turfs.

The practice continues to run well in Europe, Australia and the major Asian Tiger economies and provides rich pickings for the brave. (Yes indeed Fortune favours the Brave).

THE MALAYSIAN OPERATION

In Malaysia and other south east Asian countries, Interpol claims the Chinese as always run the structures, the organizations and control the practice whilst in Malaysia at least of the last 2 decades, the Chinese have been fortunate enough to find a large enough pool of desperate young Indians willing to do their dirty work for them in this field.

CREATING A POOL OF INDIAN TALENT

Mainly Chinese run property syndicates have been purchasing rubber estates when prices were depressed for real estate development. They obtain government permits with ease bribing officials, eject the Indian labourer population without notice (much like Lim Eng Guan did in Penang recently).

The labourers in these plantations are generally people who have for decades lived in isolation from urban Malaysia and have depended on the income from rubber in these plantations to survive. Forcing them into exile into a life they are not accustomed to unprotected and ill equipped to live in a highly urban environment has always been a recipe for disaster. Not to the Chinese run gangs.

Forced evictions like these have helped create a desperate environment, abreeding ground for toughies amongst them like Kugan to do anything to survive. Many are without education or training, the result of years of nglect by government and their own community leaders.

Kugan was, according to material we have come across, one such candidate. A suspected bit player in a ring who was both trusted and skilful in his work. He knew the players. That means he knew the identity of everyone in the ring and became a danger to those at the top if caught. And caught he was in the end.

AUTO THEFT

Cars stolen by professional auto theft gangs are quickly and professionally disassembled within Kuala Lumpur and its precincts in professionally equipped auto workshops for the purpose. This is a multi billion dollar industry efficiently run by its operators at every level. Timing and discretion are critical to its success.

Parts and components of luxury cars which in sum total fetch more than the completely assembled vehicle on the open and black markets is the prize. Not the assembled vehicle as popular legend would have one believe. Luxury cars such as the Mercedez, BMW, Lexus and other well known brands are expensive for their replacement parts.

“Accidents” are often according to our source staged by “cowboys” who drive uninsured second hand vehicles crash them into these luxury vehicles which creates an immediate demand for a replacement part such as a guard, side panel, grille or fully assembled door.

In terms of dollars the replacement costs and cost of labour make it prohibitive. The offenders cannot pay. A good stolen second hand part suddenly becomes a valuable commodity.

Not all owners of luxury vehicles go to a recommended service centre or agent for a replacement part, for spares or for service. Owing to this practice in Asia, the second hand parts market has become a multi billion dollar industry fully finance by the poorly regulated insurance sector. Entry barriers to the insurance auto scam industry are low.

The chances of getting caught and prosecuted in a high end operation is, even lower where police protection is involved. The returns are significantly higher than that of most other legitimate businesses such as taxi driving, the assembly line, the petrol pump, fruit vegetable or other groceries operations and general labour. In fact the penalties are relatively insignificant although the returns and risks higher when compared to that of drug peddling.

INSURANCE COMPANY PARTICIPATION AND COMPLICITY IN CRIME

A number of large Malaysian general insurance companies with foreign underwriter agreements have been actively participating in these scams either willingly, through neglect or ignorance of the deception and fraud being perpetrated by their executives. At least that’s their story when discovered and caught out.

We are not at liberty to name the three main players in the auto theft scam market in Malaysia as supplied to us by our source. However it is fair to say that the cooking of books in Malaysia’s insurance and banking sector is legend that it has become a conduit for black money, a convenient hole for Australian and European financial institutions to channel funds through in a number of schemes designed to fill in deficits temporarily when their compliance audits fall due (for a fee of course).

HERE IS HOW IT WORKS.

A car goes missing, it gets sold on the open market within hours or days through a network of workshops to customers. The pay offs are settled by the larger operators to the low level hackers like Kugan immediately in cash when a stolen car is delivered to a recommened workshop for disassembly successfully.

The insurance company receives its claim from the “victim” and processes it relatively quickly (depending on who the insurance agent is who makes the application). A code is sent with the claim to the insurers claims department which an operative within the insurance company must recognize as an “approved” job for the claim to be processed favourably. It is then processed without too much fuss. Any loose ends are quickly dealt within a “team”.

At the end of the month, the head of the “team” within the insurance company has his commissions settled into accounts such as their credit cards or mortgages by the scam operators. In many instances cash is still used.

In the alternative a child’s education fees abroad is paid for from a separate account controlled by the syndicate. Typically this is done from a charitable foundation registered in the Cayman Islands, Labuan or somewhere else in Asia like Hong Kong. So far so good. The level of sophistication is much higher than space here would permit for fuller description.

Nothing seems terribly complicated. It occurs every day. People torch their vehicles for insurance money. Insurance executives are pressured (and some willingly) to reduce claims paid on legitimate policies by up to half of the entitlement to a policy holder, especially during times of emotional distress such as when a person dies or has had an accident and is on life support in hospital.

It is a daily practice in places like Malaysia. The policy holder in such circumstances are pressured to accept a smaller amount in entitlement and to cover the rest themselves out of their own personal resources.

Heart, kidney, liver and other critical organ defective patients quite often find themselves staring down the barrel of an insurance company fraud in their moment of despair, having to argue with insurance company lawyers about the fine print in their policies whilst on their death beds.

This is no time to argue with the insurance companies who are acutely aware of the vulnerability of their policy holders. And they cash in on it. So here in this market (health or casualty insurance) they make up for those other amounts lost through paying out on theft of motor vehicles and other fraudulent general insurance claims. Get the picture so far?

THE INVESTIGATION-BACK TO THE KUGAN MATTER

An audit was ordered on one of the participating (fraud) insurance companies in Malaysia by their Australian underwriting partner. Amongst the audit team a forensic accountant from one of Australia’s premier top 5 firms.

He was accompanied by a former Australian Federal Police officer very well versed in these operations. Needless to say an audit uncovered a number of suspect transactions and irregularities that should have alarmed the company’s own internal auditor and its financial controllers. It did not.

And they provided no answers nor explanations that could have even by the widest stretch of the imagination been considered reasonable let alone professional to their Australian counterparts investigating.

Suspicion began to fall on a group of executives, three in one company alone who took leave without notice when the alarm was raised. At least one who was being investigated took medical leave and could not be contacted for a considerable period of time.

The standards applied to the accounts of the particular insurers were, to say the least according to our sources, substandard and certainly not in compliance with the accepted accounting standards or practices of any reputable accounting body. In that group one would have to include the Malaysian peak professional accounting bodies.

What concerned the auditor from Australia most was the way in which generous and prompt payments were made to car theft claimants (luxury cars mainly) whilst legitimate claims in the health and casualty divisions and other general insurance areas of business were in some cases halved inspite of the underwriters obligations to paying these out in full.

The monies saved or retaineed in these businesses of the insurance companies were being diverted to the other accounts (auto theft) to make up for the deficits there. Again the general fire and theft of auto and other valuable property rated very highly. Smelling a scam of the highest order in a country where consumer rights are trampled on easily, the auditor wired Melbourne for assistance.

Careful not to become a casualty like a colleague in a similar investigation of corruption in Bangkok the late 1990’s an Australian auditor who was assassinated by Chinese Thai gangs for uncovering a similar racket in the building industry there, the auditor sought protection and was kept under constant surveillance whilst the investigative audits progressed slowly in KL.

The Australians together with the aid of some local assistance got Kugan after he was himself fingered by a colleague and then filmed doing a car job. Kugan then began to cooperate but not fully yet. It was here that elements of the Royal Malaysian Police Force who were themselves involved collecting protection from the insurance fraud gang went into action.

Kugan was picked up and tortured (interrogated) unbeknownst to the Australian team, to reveal to the police acting for the syndicates to tell them how much he Kugan knew and how much he Kugan had told the Australian investigators during their more civilzed interrogation o the man with the benefit of evidence they presented him against him.

There was at least one civilian present at the time of Kugan’s interrogation at the police cells. He was neither a policeman, nor official of the insurance companies but an operative of the insurnace scam syndicates. The largest of them.

The Indian police constable accused of administering the beating to Kugan was on the payroll of the individual from the gang present at the time of Kugan’s interrogation. And that Indian police operative was not alone in assaulting and eventually killing Kugan.

KUGAN MUST GO

Disposing of Kugan was a decision taken at the top once it was discovered the Australians had information about thextent and structure of the car theft operation in Malaysia and the complicity of 3 insurance companies in the scam.

For their part the Australians themselves appear to have been negligent in not providing Kugan and another accomplice fuller protection against personal danger in the circumstances. That failure led directly to Kugan’s death. He was vulnerable and marked since they the Austrlaian investigators had him pulled in for interrogation.

Kugan was exposed by a naieve investigative team who now discovered the extent of the rorts their client’s in Australia and elsewhere were paying for in terms of their reputation and their investment in a country like Malaysia in its insurance sector.

CONCLUSION

As we conclude this article for the moment, we are aware that a part of the investigation was voluntarily stopped by the Australians. Although a second area of investigation into money laundering continues with the Australian Federal Police investigating the use of insurance companies in Malaysia for fraudulent transaction (internal) to launder the proceeds of crime from Australia and Asia.

THE VALUE OF A HUMAN LIFE IN THE EYES OF MALAYSIA’S OPPOSITION

What’s more tragic is how the mainly Chinese opposition carry the memory of Teoh Beng Hock (which Teoh deserves) but forgets the rest of those who have in almost identical circumstances met their deaths whilst in police custody.

It is tragic because the parochialism which enters the equation in finding justice for these victims make it harder to achieve those aims when the principles that drive the opposition are so divisive along racial lines. To Lim Kit Siang and Anwar Ibrahim a Chinese death in custody is worth more than a Tamil’s or a Malays. Nothing can be achieved that is just through unjust means and selfishness.

Shelly Bain

LAWYERS ON TRIAL – A MURDER MOST FOUL

the following is copied from Gopal Raj Kumar's wordpress

ARE THESE AN EXCEPTION TO OR ARE THEY THEY RULE

The legal profession in Malaysia has been unaccountable and unresponsive to the public for too long. The government now has an obligation to intervene and to dissolve the Malaysian Bar and its affiliated bodies and to bring them all under the control of a statutory body or the Attorney General or minister for law and order.

These suspects in the murder of Sosilawati (and I stress suspects) lawyers, are no different to the vast majority of lawyers practising in Malaysia. They have little or no effective supervision over their conduct as lawyers or over the quality of the services in law they provide to their long suffering overcharged clients.

Some like the accused in the Sosilawati murders have in the past and continue in the present to indulge in extra legal activities as an adjunct to their regular legal professional activities, using strong arm tactics to get the results they want from their clients and their opponents. Often employing illicit means to obtain an advantage over their opponents. There is nothing new in the conduct of much of the legal profession in this regard.

Others still (at a perceived higher level of the profession) use the muscle of political influence, engage corrupt police as enforcers, whilst many more engage in the practice of extortion in its pure definition. These allegations appear from individual complaints to be the rule rather than the exception in the legal profession in Malaysia, although these allegations if put to the bar council are likely to be vehemently denied by their board.

The most despicable of offences lawyers are accused of arise from their failure to perform adequately and honourably their obligations towards clients in “capital” cases facing death. Especially where “capital” cases are concerned their conduct is found to be seriously wanting.

The level of extortion and emotional blackmailing of families of death row inmates is legend in the Malaysian legal profession. No conclusive or indepth study into misconduct in the legal profession in Malaysia of any substance has to date been undertaken by anyone. An opportunity or the purpose has now arisen and government must rise to the occassion.

There is a plethora of evidence both anecdotal and substantive which demands the government must act with a Royal Commission of inquiry and to now turn the blow torch on the bellies of these yellow livered bunch of bullies, a law unto themselves thus far in the wake of the Sosilawati murder.

These allegations of improper conduct applies also to those so called “top” criminal lawyers in the country including in particular those who sit in parliament and on large corporations and on public committees for a side income and influence, hiding behind legal and parliamentary privilege to carry out their deeds. Their privileged positions have become their fig leaf to conceal their otherwise nefarious, unmeritorious and disgraceful conduct, eagerly blaming their failures on government in the process.

http://takemon.wordpress.com/2009/08/22/they-shoot-horses-dont-they/

The collective failure of the legal profession to perform to a standard expected of them is whats at issue here. And without a governing body capable of enforcing those standards, this is the result. An extreme example though this may be, it nonetheless is a wake up call to all. Bring the bar to heel and get rid of that politically driven coeterie of loud mouths who use their privilege and profession to attack government, dividing the community in the process and defaming anyone who does not see the world through their eyes, whilst ignoring their primary role in service to the public.

AN OPEN AND INDEPENDENT INQUIRY INTO THE LEGAL PROFESSION NOW

An open inquiry and a public audit of legal practitioners and their firms will no doubt be resisted at every level to protect what has become a golden goose to many in the profession. An indepedent outside body should be appointed to audit the practicing standards of individual lawyers urgently as a priority.

The Bar Council should have no input into the process. The vast majority of them live in an intellectual and regulatory vacuum believing themselves to be competent and efficient, the source of their self righteousness. What is likely to come out of such an inquiry will undoubtedly shock the nation. It is a long overdue exercise into a self regulated incompetent unaccountable powerful sector of the community working against the public interests.

The governing peak professional body of the legal profession in Malaysia, The Malaysian Bar is a self serving inept body incapable of any supervisory role over their members. They perform a cursory duty to themselves behind closed doors. The body itself at its board level is made up of equally inefficient and incompetent people. Mostly loud mouths who seek power at any cost even if that comes at the expense of the paying suffering public.

The legal profession should be opened up to independent public scrutiny now. The quality of legal services are overly expensive and very low by universal standards. There ought to be an inquiry into the profession and the Malaysian Bar Council itself. Government has been delivered an opportunity on a silver platter to once and for all shake up these self appointed self serving spokespeople for the rights of everyone, who in reality have been serving themselves all the way to the bank, unaccountable to the public they are meant to serve in the process.

A final note:

Datukships like that purportedly given to the accused in the Sosilawati murder, have been on sale for a while. Let’s make no pretences about the point. It demeans the role of our traditional rulers and brings the title into disrepute.

CONCLUSION

Each of the accused if found guilty by a competent court should be hanged till dead. It is hoped the legal profession has something to say for their members facing charges of a capital offence. Human life has become a dispensable commodity in Malaysia in its quest for personal wealth and materialism.

Likewise it is hoped that the Malaysian bar will have th courage of their ‘convictions’ to come forward and assure the public that the allegations against tow and possibly more of their membership are isolated cases of individuals within the profession going astray, rather than this being an extreme of the example of what really goes on within the legal profession in Malaysia.

The silence of the Bar Council and the Malaysian Bar in the face of such an event as the Sosilawati murder allegations levelled against one of their own, may well and justly be interpreted as a form of acknowledgement by the Malaysian Bar, that thee are paralysed by the truth emerging about what many have over the years suspected of their collective membership as a dishonourable and lawless body of self serving individuals in whom the trust of a nation has been betrayed.

Gopal Raj Kumar

Selamat Hari Raya

Seruan perpaduan umat islam sejajar ajaran al-quran


TRONOH 14 Julai - Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin berkata, seruan perpaduan bagi umat Islam adalah sejajar dengan gesaan Al-quran supaya umatnya sentiasa bersatu padu dan berpegang teguh kepada ajaran kitab suci itu.

Timbalan Perdana Menteri berkata, langkah itu dapat menghindari perpecahan sebagaimana firman Allah SWT dalam surah Ali-Imran supaya umat Islam sentiasa berpegang teguh kepada tali Allah dan mengelakkan diri daripada berpecah-belah.

''Dalam ayat 103 surah itu, Allah SWT mengingatkan umat Islam supaya sentiasa mengenang nikmat Allah yang menyatukan hati-hati mereka yang dahulunya bermusuh-musuhan, iaitu ketika mereka berada di zaman jahiliah, sehingga dengan nikmat Allahlah umat Islam menjadi orang yang bersaudara.

''Tidak ada seruan yang lebih jelas daripada ayat 103 dalam surah Ali-Imran ini yang menyeru umat Islam agar bersatu padu dan memperkukuhkan tali persaudaraan," katanya.

Beliau berkata demikian ketika berucap merasmikan Majlis Tilawah Al-quran Peringkat Kebangsaan kali ke-52 di Universiti Teknologi Petronas, di sini malam ini.

Muhyiddin berkata, sejajar dengan seruan ke arah perpaduan ummah, sudah sampai masanya bagi umat Islam mengetepikan sebarang perbezaaan dan sama-sama memperkukuhkan perpaduan serta memajukan negara dan umat.

Beliau percaya, sekiranya semua pihak ikhlas dalam mengutamakan perpaduan, maka umat Islam dapat mengatasi segala perbezaan yang wujud sesama sendiri dan menambah upaya memajukan umat.

''Dalam sebuah negara berbilang kaum dan agama seperti Malaysia, perpaduan kalangan umat Islam sebagai masyarakat majoriti serta persefahaman antara masyarakat berbilang agama merupakan asas penting kestabilan dan keamanan negara," katanya.

Beliau berkata, kitab suci Al-quran juga menganjurkan umat Islam menggunakan akal untuk memperolehi ilmu yang bermanfaat bagi memajukan diri.

Jelasnya, ini kerana kemajuan hanya boleh dicapai sekiranya umat Islam bersedia untuk mempelajari pelbagai ilmu dan sentiasa mempunyai sikap untuk berinovasi.

''Dalam dunia global yang pantas berubah dengan pelbagai kemajuan dalam bidang sains dan teknologi, penguasaan ilmu itu merupakan satu kewajipan kepada umat Islam pada hari ini," katanya lagi.

''Penguasaan ilmu ini akan membolehkan umat Islam muncul sebagai umat terbaik atau Khaira Ummah sebagaimana yang dijanjikan Al-quran," katanya.

Bagi mencapai hasrat itu, Muhyiddin berkata, umat Islam perlu melakukan anjakan nilai dan budaya dan memiliki nilai budaya yang secocok dengan nilai kemajuan serta sentiasa berusaha gigih menguasai ilmu kemahiran.

Katanya, hanya dengan cara itu sahaja umat Islam mampu meningkatkan keupayaan untuk menjana kemajuan yang lebih gemilang bagi negara dan umat seluruhnya.

Dalam pada itu, Muhyiddin berkata, kerajaan sentiasa prihatin untuk menyuburkan lagi perkembangan ilmu-ilmu Al-quran terutamanya dalam bidang tahfiz Al-quran.

''Untuk tujuan ini, kerajaan telah meluluskan peruntukan RM10 juta untuk membiayai program pengajian peringkat ijazah sarjana muda di institusi pengajian tinggi awam bagi graduan Diploma Tahfiz Darul Quran yang diiktiraf kerajaan.

''Ini merupakan salah satu daripada usaha murni kerajaan untuk menarik minat pelbagai golongan untuk memahami Al-quran dan memartabatkan Islam," katanya.

Pemimpin Bertelagah Menyimpang Prinsip Islam : Raja Nazrin Isnin Ogos 30, 2010

IPOH: Raja Muda Perak Raja Dr Nazrin Shah hari ini bertitah bahawa pemimpin Islam yang memilih untuk bertelagah dan bersaing mencari pengaruh, sehingga tergamak melakukan perkara-perkara ekstrem yang mencemar agama dan maruah ummah, sebagai golongan yang telah menyimpang dari prinsip asas Islam.


Ini kerana prinsip asas Islam sentiasa menyeru kepada perpaduan ummah, titah baginda sempena Majlis Anugerah Kecemerlangan Pelajar Yayasan Pembangunan Ekonomi Islam Malaysia (YaPeim) peringkat negeri serta sumbangan Aidilfitri Majlis Agama Islam dan Adat Melayu Perak (MAIPK) di sini.


Menurut baginda, penderitaan dan penghinaan yang menimpa sebahagian umat Islam di dunia terutama contoh-contoh ketara di Palestin, Afghanistan dan Iraq, bermula dari pemesongan yang berlaku di kalangan pemimpin hingga mereka sendiri membuka laluan yang membolehkan bukan Islam melakukan pencerobohan dan kemusnahan.


"Pencerobohan besar bermula dari perbuatan kecil. Ia mungkin bermula dari sebuah surau, atau sebuah madrasah, atau sebuah masjid atau sebuah mimbar.


"Ia bermula dari satu ungkapan, satu ucapan, satu khutbah, satu tazkirah atau satu doa; ia bermula dari pencerobohan kecil dan jika dalam menghadapi pencerobohan kecil, umat Islam masih belum insaf, masih berdegil dan masih sombong mempertahankan ego, masih memilih untuk bertelagah, maka umat Islam sebenarnya telah memberikan petanda yang salah; petanda seolah-olah menggalakkan pencerobohan lebih besar boleh dilakukan ke atas umat Islam dan terhadap institusi Islam," titah baginda.


"Umat Islam di negara ini kini berada dalam suasana kritikal, bagaikan tenggelam punca, bagaikan bersedia berpaut kepada apa sahaja yang dapat dicapai untuk terus timbul dalam arus yang mungkin membawa mereka menuju kepada penghujung yang amat membimbangkan," titah baginda.


Umat Islam wajib mengambil pengajaran sebelum nasi menjadi bubur, tegas baginda.


"Ingatlah! Sedarilah! Insaflah! ketika umat Islam jatuh dan menjadi lemah, janganlah diharap ada pihak yang akan bersimpati untuk membela nasib mereka. Masa hadapan dan penentuan nasib umat Islam berada di tangan umat Islam. Selagi umat Islam kekal bersatu dan teguh berpadu, tidak ada pihak yang boleh meruntuh atau menjatuhkannya.


Kejatuhan umat akan berlaku apabila umat memilih untuk tidak bersatu malah saban hari terus menghakiskan kekuatan di antara satu sama lain," titah baginda.


Baginda bertitah jika para pemimpin di peringkat tertinggi organisasi memperlihatkan contoh teladan bersefahaman, saling membantu dan saling bekerjasama, pengikut di bawah tentunya akan dapat bertaut erat.


"Bahawa pemikiran, perkataan dan tindak laku pemimpin itu akan dijadikan teladan ikutan dan menjadi penentu arah kepada pengikut, kerana itu, jika pemimpin bertelagah maka pengikut akan turut berpecah," titah Raja Nazrin.


"Berbahagialah ummah, jika barisan pemimpin Islam dan organisasi berteraskan Islam senantiasa berusaha menjalinkan semangat persefahaman serta senantiasa bergerak ke arah membina jambatan kerjasama; tentunya pemikiran, tenaga dan sumber umat Islam akan menjadi lebih produktif dan ukhuwah di kalangan ummah akan menjadi lebih teguh," titah baginda.


Raja Nazrin turut mengingatkan para pemimpin bahawa selagi golongan fakir miskin wujud di negara ini, mereka masih berdepan cabaran dan tanggungjawab besar untuk memastikan pengagihan sumber kekayaan negara berlaku secara adil dan saksama.


"Kewujudan fakir miskin harus juga menginsafkan warga yang telah hidup senang, warga yang telah mendapat banyak nikmat serta kemudahan, untuk tidak bersifat tamak, bernafsu membolot seluruh kekayaan tanpa menghiraukan penderitaan golongan yang masih miskin dan susah.


Usaha membantu fakir miskin - usaha membasmi kemiskinan adalah satu jihad. Agihan pendapatan yang lebih saksama merupakan satu kewajipan yang perlu dilaksanakan oleh para pemimpin yang memegang amanah pemerintahan," titahnya.


Baginda bertitah keadilan sejati masih belum tercapai sepenuhnya selagi agihan kekayaan yang saksama tidak dapat dipenuhi, sehingga menyebabkan jurang pendapatan yang ketara antara orang miskin dan kaya.


"Apatah lagi jika cara kekayaan terhimpun kepada kumpulan tertentu yang diperoleh melalui pemberian yang tidak mematuhi amalan pengurusan yang telus lagi teratur, titah baginda. - BERNAMA

Apa yang ada pada Anwar?

Oleh Angela

Adakah dia seorang seorang ulama yang tersohor yang mendapat pendidikan agama daripada ulama terkemuka? TIDAK. Adakah dia mendapat pendidikan dalam bidang agama? TIDAK. Adakah dia keluaran institusi penggajian tinggi terkemuka? TIDAK. Adakah dia seorang berjiwa rohaniyah? TIDAK. Adakah dia berguru dengan guru yang benar2 murshid? TIDAK. Adakah dia mengamalkan mana-mana amalan tarikat? TIDAK. Adakah dia seorang ilmuan ulung? TIDAK. Adalah dia mempelajari ilmu ke peringkat tertinggi di mana2 universiti? TIDAK. Adakah dia seorang tokoh ilmuan yang ulung dan disegani? TIDAK. So what is he and who is he? Di seorang pemidato yang mempunyai ilmu yang tinggi? Pemidato yes, ilmu NO. He has only rhetoric, and no ilmu.

Adakah dia seorang yang berakhlak mulia? TIDAK, malah dia berjuang untuk LGBT dan diakui melakukan perkara di luar tabi'i. Jadi apa yang Anwar ada yang boleh dia jadi TPM, dapat bermacam title dan augerah, keistimewaan di Amerika, disanjung di seluruh dunia, mempunyai wang dan harta yang banyak?

Jawapannya senang sahaja, dia jual maruah diri, bangsa dan agama, dan menggadai negara kepada kuasa2 asing. Dia dilonjakkan ke pesada dunia oleh global elite yang sangat kaya dan berkuasa. Dengan lonjakkan itu dia mendabik dada, dialah hero, dialah wira. Media antarabangsa yang dikuasai oleh global elite Jesuit-zionist-masonic-illuminati yang meletakkan Anwar sebagai wira, but not for nothing, but for return favours dari Anwar - iaitu apabila Anwar memegang tampuk kuasa.

Umpan sudah diberi selama ini, jadi program mesti teruskan, tidak boleh berpatah balik sebab sudah terlanjur. Selama ini programnya tidak menjadi kenyataan sebab Anwar memandang rendah kepada bangsa sendiri dan agamanya sendiri - dan orang yang Anwar pandang rendah itu sentiasa berdoa semoga Anwar tidak akan berjaya dengan cita2 dan niat jahatnya kepada kami2 yang lemah.

Hanya Allah yang Maha Kuasa, dan hanya Allah yang menghalang cita2 Anwar selama ini. Pada kesempatan yang sama, kelengahan Anwar untuk mencapai cita2nya telah memberi masa yang selesa untuk terdedahnya kelakuan dan akhlak buruk Anwar di khalayak ramai.

Hanya mereka yang terlalu taksub, yang buta hati, yang mengharapkan keuntungan undi, yang akan menyokong Anwar. Dengan wang ringgit dan rangkaian underground network Anwar selama ini, cita2nya masih belum berhasil.

Anwar diberikan banyak masa, banyak peluang untuk bermuhasabah diri, dan renungkan kesilapan, dan siapa diri dia sebenar. Tetapi umur yang diberikan itu tidak dimanfaat untuk kebaikan, tetapi sebaliknya dia gunakan untuk terus melakukan kerosakan di muka bumi. Inilah orang yang tidak ada cahaya ruhaniyyah, yang tidak akan melihat jalan pulang.

Kassim Ahmad took that difficult step to return where he belongs - he was a brilliant scholar, who was also used by the Fabian Society / LSE untuk agenda NWO socialist international, tetapi akhirnya berhadapan dengan realiti, so he took THE LONG JOURNEY HOME (the title of his book).

For Anwar, it is not too late, we will all forgive you, kalau kamu mahu kembali ke pangkal jalan. Kita diajar supaya memaafkan orang, dan itulah ajaran Islam yang suci.

Kami tidak benci kamu, tetapi kami hanya benci dengan sikap khianat kamu selama ini.

Otak Dalam Bahaya Jika Tidak Solat

Dulu, kita dengar, dalam solat, ketika bersujud, darah akan mengalirkan oxygen ke otak kita, tapi sekarang kita dapati ada maklumat yang lebih terperinici. Ikuti di bawah ini, sumbangan dari blog lain yg say ajumpa ketika berlayar.


Seorang doktor di Amerika Syarikat telah memeluk Islam kerana beberapa keajaiban yang ditemui dalam penyelidikannya. Dia amat kagum dengan penemuan tersebut, sehingga tidak dapat diterima oleh akal fikiran.

Dia adalah seorang Doktor Neurologi . Setelah memeluk Islam, dia amat yakin akan perubatan secara Islam dan dengan itu telah membuka sebuah klinik yang bertemakan “Perubatan Melalui Al-Qur’an” . Kajian perubatan melalui Al-Qur’an membuatkan ubat-ubatannya berteraskan apa yang terdapat di dalam Al-Qur’an.

Di antara kaedah-kaedah yang digunakan termasuklah berpuasa, madu lebah, biji hitam (black seed) dan sebagainya. Apabila ditanya bagaimana dia tertarik untuk memeluk Islam, maka doktor tersebut memberitahu bahawa semasa beliau melakukan kajian urat saraf, terdapat beberapa urat saraf di dalam otak manusia yang tidak dimasuki oleh darah . Padahal setiap inci otak manusia memerlukan darah yang cukup untuk berfungsi secara normal. Setelah membuat kajian yang memakan masa, akhirnya beliau mendapati Bahawa darah tidak akan memasuki urat saraf di dalam otak manusia melainkan pada ketika seseorang itu sedang sujud semasa mengerjakan Sembahyang!!!

Urat tersebut memerlukan darah hanya untuk Beberapa sukatan yang tertentu sahaja. Ini bermaksud bahawa darah hanya akan memasuki urat tersebut mengikut kadar sembahyang waktu yang diwajibkan oleh Islam…… Begitulah keagungan ciptaan Allah!!! tidak menunaikan sembahyang , akan otaknya tidak Akan dapat menerima darah yang secukupnya untuk berfungsi secara normal!!! Oleh yang demikian, kejadian manusia ini sebenarnya adalah untuk menganuti agama Islam ’sepenuhnya’ kerana sifat fitrah kejadiannya memang telah dikaitkan oleh Allah dengan agama-Nya yang indah

Doa buat si Kapiark!

Article berikut ada lah salinan dari blog2 lain.

Khutbah Jumaat di Pulau Pinang kini menjadi medan untuk menjilat Ketua Menteri Paling Celaka Dalam Sejarah Negeri. Aparat aparat Khawarij PAS begitu bersungguh sungguh mendewa dewakan sikafir harbi ini hinggakan mendoakan beliau didalam Khutbah Jumaat.
Kelaziman dalam lafaz doa bagi khutbah kedua dibacakan untuk ketua negeri atau ketua agama Islam tetapi mengapa mendoakan untuk seorang yang anti Islam dan Melayu,pembohong seperti Guan Eng seorang kafir harbi.
Begitulah teruknya sebahagian penjilat tegar Khalifah Sosialis hinggakan sanggup membuang Yang di-Pertuan Agong Tuanku Mizan Zainal Abidin dan TYT Gabenor Tun Rahman Abas sebaliknya mendoakan Lim Guan Eng didalam khutbah Jumaat.
Perkara ini sudah berlaku dibeberapa buah masjid sekitar Tasek Gelugor, Permatang Pauh dan Jelutong.
Buktinya pada Jumaat minggu lepas,13 Ogos di Masjid Padang Menora Tasik Gelugor. Khatib Ustaz Zakaria Ahmad mendoakan Ketua Menteri Khalifah Sosialis Guan Eng menggantikan Yang Pertuan Agong didalam Khutbah Jumaat.
Tindakan itu mencetuskan kemarahan dan bantahan dikalangan jemaah yang hadir apabila menyedari doa itu membelakangkan YDP Agung hinggakan ada yang tergamam mengapa harus menyebut nama seorang kafir harbi yang semua orang tahu begitu kuat berbohong dan anti melayu.
Mimbar masjid dijadikan pentas politik,mendoakan seorang kafir harbi pula menjadi keutamaan buat penganut Isle PAS.
Ini sudah sampai ketahap kurang ajar hinggakan para imam masjid dijadikan pencacai politik gampangan sosialis ultra kiasu DAP.
Adakah dengan hanya Guan Eng memberi sedikit gula gula pada program Ehya Ramadhan yang bertujuan untuk membeli undi khariah masjid di Dewan Serbaguna Jawi sudah menjadi lesen besar untuk menendang keluar nama Yang Dipertuan Agong? Guan Eng sicelaka ini diangkat bagaikan raja, Yang Dipertuan Agung dan TYT Gabenor di hina .Khawarij PAS harus bertanggungjawab. Adakah ini salah satu titik tolak mengajar orang melayu supaya menderhaka kepada Seri Paduka Baginda Yang Di Pertuan Agong?
Ajaran PAS yang menggankat Guan Eng bagaikan seorang khalifah sosialis bererti mereka menghalalkan segala tindakan Guan Eng yang kita semua kenali sebagai seorang pembohong,anti Islam dan anti melayu.
Tahap kebodohan khawarij PAS bagaikan sudah mengila,menjadi bangsat dan jalang seperti PAS menjilat Guan Eng adalah satu keutamaan.
Nasihat Pisau,Khatib dan imam janganlah menjadi perkakas politik chauvanis ultra kiasu DAP.

tamat

Kalau benar berlaku,dan tentu nya makmum2 tergamam dan bercakap, membantah, nyata ,jumaat terbatal,maka makmum kena lah buat solat zohor sahaja. Send diri mau hengat!!!